ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE FROM GROUND SHOCK AS A RESULT OF A BOMBING

Authors

  • Graeme McKenzie
  • Bijan Samali
  • Chunwei Zhang
  • Eric Ancich

Keywords:

Ground shock, R waves, PPV, displacement, Charge weight

Abstract

The term bombing refers to an uncontrolled demolition (implosion) where a terrorist employs an
explosive of a charge weight and detonates it at range and height (air or ground blast) suitable to cause the
maximum damage. For a designer trying to design a structure in advance of such a situation happening is
extremely difficult thus requiring the consideration of past bombings for the pertinent design parameters. Ground
shock is a small earthquake that impacts the structure via energy released from the detonation of the bomb into
the ground being converted to wave energy with compression (P) waves, shear (S) waves and the most damaging
surface Raleigh (R) waves moving out in all directions from the point of detonation whether it is on or above
ground. The common measurement for quantifying ground shock from blast loadings is the peak particle velocity
(PPV) as it correlates reasonably well with both building damage and the annoyance levels that people can tolerate
under normal circumstances. The Oklahoma City VIED bombing has been used as an example using CONWEP
software for a 2200kg VIED detonated at 4.75m from the building. Ground shock results showed that a PPV of
11.5m/s (11500mm/s) was achieved well in excess of guidelines set by AS 2187 and DIN 4150. As well the
structure was subjected to radial displacements of 100mm to 350mm adding to the overall damage. Considering
the ground shock results along with a reflected overpressure of 51.17MPa it is unsurprising that the building
collapsed and many were killed and injured. This is the recommended design overpressure.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-30

How to Cite

Graeme McKenzie, Bijan Samali, Chunwei Zhang, & Eric Ancich. (2019). ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE FROM GROUND SHOCK AS A RESULT OF A BOMBING. GEOMATE Journal, 16(53), 190–203. Retrieved from https://geomatejournal.com/geomate/article/view/2851

Most read articles by the same author(s)